Arc B580 vs Radeon R9 380X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380X and Arc B580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 380X
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
15.52

Arc B580 outperforms R9 380X by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.8993.02
Power efficiency5.8214.63
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Xe2 (2025)
GPU code nameAntiguaBMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 November 2015 (9 years ago)16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc B580 has 1079% better value for money than R9 380X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Compute units32no data
Core clock speedno data2670 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate124.2427.2
Floating-point processing power3.973 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs128160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length221 mm272 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors​2 x 6-pin1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s456.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.4
Mantle+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 380X 15.52
Arc B580 39.05
+152%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380X 6162
Arc B580 15505
+152%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−178%
125
+178%
1440p27−30
−159%
70
+159%
4K16−18
−163%
42
+163%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.09
−155%
1.99
+155%
1440p8.48
−138%
3.56
+138%
4K14.31
−141%
5.93
+141%
  • Arc B580 has 155% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc B580 has 138% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc B580 has 141% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 143
+0%
143
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Dota 2 140
+0%
140
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 78
+0%
78
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how R9 380X and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 178% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 159% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 163% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.52 39.05
Recency 19 November 2015 16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Arc B580 has a 151.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 380X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 187 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 458 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380X or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.