Radeon RX 5300M vs R9 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390 with Radeon RX 5300M, including specs and performance data.

R9 390
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
23.09
+107%

R9 390 outperforms RX 5300M by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking222390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.4712.65
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGrenadaNavi 14 / E19M-E65
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$20 (0.1x MSRP)$525

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5300M has 1% better value for money than R9 390.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601408
Core clock speedno data1036 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1445 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0127.2
Floating-point performance5,120 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 390 and Radeon RX 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB3 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390 23.09
+107%
RX 5300M 11.15

R9 390 outperforms RX 5300M by 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 390 8915
+107%
RX 5300M 4307

R9 390 outperforms RX 5300M by 107% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 390 12730
+23.5%
RX 5300M 10306

R9 390 outperforms RX 5300M by 24% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+103%
64
−103%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 59
+119%
27−30
−119%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+113%
24−27
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 70
+133%
30−33
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+126%
35−40
−126%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Hitman 3 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Metro Exodus 87
+118%
40−45
−118%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41
+128%
18−20
−128%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 61
+126%
27−30
−126%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+125%
24−27
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Hitman 3 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Metro Exodus 66
+120%
30−33
−120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 61
+126%
27−30
−126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+122%
27−30
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+108%
12−14
−108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
+120%
10−11
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+121%
24−27
−121%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

This is how R9 390 and RX 5300M compete in popular games:

  • R9 390 is 103% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.09 11.15
Recency 18 June 2015 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 65 Watt

The Radeon R9 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5300M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 539 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 93 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.