Radeon HD 7870 vs R9 380

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380 and Radeon HD 7870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 380
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
15.78
+32.2%

R9 380 outperforms HD 7870 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking350416
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.152.99
Power efficiency5.734.71
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameAntiguaPitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)5 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

R9 380 has 206% better value for money than HD 7870.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921280
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate108.680.00
Floating-point processing power3.476 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length221 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full length / dual slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pin2x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s153.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity++
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_1)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 380 15.78
+32.2%
HD 7870 11.94

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380 6100
+32.1%
HD 7870 4617

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 380 12191
+96.8%
HD 7870 6194

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 380 29722
+39.2%
HD 7870 21348

Unigine Heaven 4.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.

R9 380 928
+22.8%
HD 7870 756

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p110−120
+31%
84
−31%
Full HD65
−1.5%
66
+1.5%
4K25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06
+72.7%
5.29
−72.7%
4K7.96
+144%
19.39
−144%
  • R9 380 has 73% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R9 380 has 144% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+30.6%
45−50
−30.6%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
Fortnite 80−85
+27.3%
65−70
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+29.2%
45−50
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Valorant 120−130
+19.6%
100−110
−19.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+30.6%
45−50
−30.6%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+20.7%
160−170
−20.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Dota 2 90−95
+20.8%
75−80
−20.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
Fortnite 80−85
+27.3%
65−70
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+29.2%
45−50
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+32.6%
40−45
−32.6%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+41.7%
36
−41.7%
Valorant 120−130
+19.6%
100−110
−19.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+30.6%
45−50
−30.6%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%
Dota 2 90−95
+20.8%
75−80
−20.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+29.2%
45−50
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+50%
20
−50%
Valorant 120−130
+19.6%
100−110
−19.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+27.3%
65−70
−27.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+29.4%
85−90
−29.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+113%
65−70
−113%
Valorant 150−160
+23.6%
120−130
−23.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Valorant 80−85
+36.7%
60−65
−36.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 50−55
+29.3%
40−45
−29.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%

This is how R9 380 and HD 7870 compete in popular games:

  • R9 380 is 31% faster in 900p
  • HD 7870 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • R9 380 is 39% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 380 is 113% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 380 surpassed HD 7870 in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.78 11.94
Recency 18 June 2015 5 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 175 Watt

R9 380 has a 32.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD 7870, on the other hand, has 8.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7870 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 831 vote

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 648 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380 or Radeon HD 7870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.