Radeon HD 7870 vs R9 390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390X and Radeon HD 7870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 390X
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
23.91
+104%

R9 390X outperforms HD 7870 by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking234416
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.912.93
Power efficiency6.114.71
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGrenadaPitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)5 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

R9 390X has 238% better value for money than HD 7870.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28161280
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate184.880.00
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs17680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length275 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin2x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB2 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s153.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity++
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_1)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 390X 23.91
+104%
HD 7870 11.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 390X 9410
+104%
HD 7870 4617

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 390X 17944
+190%
HD 7870 6194

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 390X 35807
+67.7%
HD 7870 21348

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p170−180
+102%
84
−102%
Full HD91
+37.9%
66
−37.9%
4K48
+129%
21−24
−129%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.71
+12.2%
5.29
−12.2%
4K8.94
+85.9%
16.62
−85.9%
  • R9 390X has 12% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R9 390X has 86% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+125%
27−30
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+125%
20−22
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+125%
27−30
−125%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+87.8%
45−50
−87.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+125%
20−22
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+103%
35−40
−103%
Fortnite 110−120
+74.2%
65−70
−74.2%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+91.7%
45−50
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
Valorant 160−170
+56.9%
100−110
−56.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+125%
27−30
−125%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+87.8%
45−50
−87.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+125%
20−22
−125%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+53.7%
160−170
−53.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Dota 2 110−120
+54.5%
75−80
−54.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+103%
35−40
−103%
Fortnite 110−120
+74.2%
65−70
−74.2%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+91.7%
45−50
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+95.3%
40−45
−95.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+117%
21−24
−117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+111%
36
−111%
Valorant 160−170
+56.9%
100−110
−56.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+87.8%
45−50
−87.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+125%
20−22
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Dota 2 110−120
+54.5%
75−80
−54.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+103%
35−40
−103%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+91.7%
45−50
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+105%
20
−105%
Valorant 160−170
+56.9%
100−110
−56.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+74.2%
65−70
−74.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+90.6%
85−90
−90.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+141%
16−18
−141%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+157%
65−70
−157%
Valorant 200−210
+62.6%
120−130
−62.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+113%
30−33
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+119%
27−30
−119%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+105%
20−22
−105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+90.9%
21−24
−90.9%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+107%
14−16
−107%
Valorant 130−140
+122%
60−65
−122%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+133%
14−16
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 75−80
+85.4%
40−45
−85.4%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+111%
18−20
−111%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+127%
10−12
−127%

This is how R9 390X and HD 7870 compete in popular games:

  • R9 390X is 102% faster in 900p
  • R9 390X is 38% faster in 1080p
  • R9 390X is 129% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 390X is 175% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 390X surpassed HD 7870 in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.91 11.73
Recency 18 June 2015 5 March 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 175 Watt

R9 390X has a 103.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

HD 7870, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 390X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7870 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 268 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 648 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390X or Radeon HD 7870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.