Radeon 620 vs R9 270X

Place in performance ranking	367	814
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.55	0.34
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Curacao XT	Polaris 24
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	8 October 2013 (10 years ago)	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data
Current price	$136 (0.7x MSRP)	$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 270X has 1238% better value for money than Radeon 620.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	384
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	84.00	24.58
Floating-point performance	2,688 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 270X and Radeon 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2 x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
DisplayPort support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	no data
CrossFire	1	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
LiquidVR	1	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
TressFX	1	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
ZeroCore	-	no data
UVD	+	no data
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
Mantle	-	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270X 12.64
+445%

Radeon 620 2.32

R9 270X outperforms 620 by 445% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 270X 4888
+445%

Radeon 620 897

R9 270X outperforms 620 by 445% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 270X 6560
+279%

Radeon 620 1730

R9 270X outperforms 620 by 279% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

20−22
+300%

5−6

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +1267%	3−4 −1267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +378%	9−10 −378%
Hitman 3	27−30 +383%	6−7 −383%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +173%	14−16 −173%
Metro Exodus	35−40	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +218%	10−12 −218%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +2200%	1−2 −2200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +1267%	3−4 −1267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +378%	9−10 −378%
Hitman 3	27−30 +383%	6−7 −383%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +173%	14−16 −173%
Metro Exodus	35−40	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +218%	10−12 −218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +333%	6−7 −333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +2200%	1−2 −2200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +378%	9−10 −378%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +173%	14−16 −173%
Metro Exodus	35−40	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +333%	6−7 −333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +2200%	1−2 −2200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+600%

5−6

−600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +525%	4−5 −525%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Hitman 3	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +333%	6−7 −333%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8	0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Hitman 3	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6	0−1