Radeon RX 7900 XT vs R7 M465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R7 M465
2017
2 GB GDDR5
2.83

RX 7900 XT outperforms R7 M465 by a whopping 2534% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking75513
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.24
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)RDNA 3
GPU code nameLitho XTNavi 31 XT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)3 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899
Current priceno data$884 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845376
Core clock speed825 MHzno data
Boost clock speed960 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data315 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00804.4
Floating-point performance864.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M465 and Radeon RX 7900 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M465 2.83
RX 7900 XT 74.53
+2534%

RX 7900 XT outperforms R7 M465 by 2534% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 M465 1095
RX 7900 XT 28811
+2531%

RX 7900 XT outperforms R7 M465 by 2531% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 M465 1740
RX 7900 XT 63712
+3562%

RX 7900 XT outperforms R7 M465 by 3562% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 M465 12250
RX 7900 XT 259707
+2020%

RX 7900 XT outperforms R7 M465 by 2020% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−2857%
207
+2857%
1440p5−6
−2800%
145
+2800%
4K3−4
−3067%
95
+3067%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−4640%
237
+4640%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2725%
110−120
+2725%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−4140%
212
+4140%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−927%
110−120
+927%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2820%
140−150
+2820%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2110%
220−230
+2110%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−2925%
484
+2925%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−6650%
130−140
+6650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−4733%
580
+4733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2725%
110−120
+2725%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3700%
190
+3700%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−900%
110
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1480%
79
+1480%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2110%
220−230
+2110%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−2813%
466
+2813%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−7750%
157
+7750%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−3125%
387
+3125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−6800%
483
+6800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2725%
110−120
+2725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3480%
179
+3480%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−927%
110−120
+927%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2110%
220−230
+2110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−2088%
350
+2088%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−7000%
142
+7000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3686%
265
+3686%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−3220%
160−170
+3220%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4700%
140−150
+4700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 80−85
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−12100%
122
+12100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−4225%
173
+4225%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4525%
180−190
+4525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−3857%
277
+3857%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−4533%
130−140
+4533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 9−10
−800%
81
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−3833%
110−120
+3833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−8100%
80−85
+8100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 130−140
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−5433%
166
+5433%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2480%
129
+2480%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2000%
80−85
+2000%

This is how R7 M465 and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is 2857% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT is 2800% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT is 3067% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 12100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7900 XT surpassed R7 M465 in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 74.53
Recency 1 January 2017 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M465 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M465 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M465
Radeon R7 M465
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1435 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.