Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon R7 M465

Place in the ranking	781	528
Place by popularity	not in top-100	65
Power efficiency	no data	18.54
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Topaz	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	80
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1125 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	27.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.864 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.3	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M465 2.97

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.58
+155%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M465 1740

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010
+130%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M465 12250

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931
+79%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −171%	19 +171%
1440p	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
4K	6−7 −183%	17 +183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−133%

14
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1800%	19 +1800%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −117%	13 +117%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −227%	45−50 +227%
Hitman 3	8−9 −100%	16 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −95.5%	40−45 +95.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1167%	38 +1167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −108%	24−27 +108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −59%	62 +59%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −227%	45−50 +227%
Hitman 3	8−9 −87.5%	15 +87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −95.5%	40−45 +95.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −100%	24 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −25.6%	49 +25.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −227%	45−50 +227%
Hitman 3	8−9 −50%	12 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −66.7%	20 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +27.3%	11 −27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −41%	55−60 +41%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−186%

20−22
+186%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Hitman 3	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −400%	10 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −176%	45−50 +176%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−117%

12−14
+117%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	8−9
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−75%

7−8
+75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +0%	16 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how R7 M465 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 171% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 233% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 183% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R7 M465 is 38% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games: