Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon R7 M380

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M380 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M380
2015
4 GB DDR3
3.77

Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms R7 M380 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking736584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.69
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTropoTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64080
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed915 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rate36.60no data
Floating-point processing power1.171 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−90%
19
+90%
1440p4−5
−125%
9
+125%
4K7−8
−100%
14
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−82.4%
31
+82.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
−62.5%
26
+62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−41.2%
24
+41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12
+50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−66.7%
20
+66.7%
Fortnite 21−24
−91.3%
40−45
+91.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−73.7%
30−35
+73.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−90.9%
21
+90.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Valorant 50−55
−42.6%
75−80
+42.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
−43.8%
23
+43.8%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+41.7%
12
−41.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−62.5%
110−120
+62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10
+25%
Dota 2 35−40
−8.3%
39
+8.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−58.3%
19
+58.3%
Fortnite 21−24
−91.3%
40−45
+91.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−73.7%
30−35
+73.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−81.8%
20
+81.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−7.7%
14
+7.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−83.3%
22
+83.3%
Valorant 50−55
−42.6%
75−80
+42.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
−43.8%
23
+43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9
+12.5%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−50%
18
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−73.7%
30−35
+73.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%
Valorant 50−55
−42.6%
75−80
+42.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−91.3%
40−45
+91.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−80.6%
55−60
+80.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−200%
6
+200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Valorant 40−45
−95.2%
80−85
+95.2%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−66.7%
10
+66.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Valorant 20−22
−85%
35−40
+85%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 12−14
−23.1%
16
+23.1%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how R7 M380 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 90% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 125% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M380 is 42% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M380 performs better in 2 tests (3%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs performs better in 56 tests (85%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.77 6.83
Recency 5 May 2015 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 81.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M380 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M380
Radeon R7 M380
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1082 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M380 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.