Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon R7 M370

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	671	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.21	no data
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	Litho	Broadwell GT3e
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 May 2015 (8 years ago)	5 September 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price	$875	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	875 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	960 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	23.04	38.40
Floating-point performance	737.3 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M370 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	IGP
Width	no data	IGP

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	73.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	Not Listed	2.0
Vulkan	no data	1.1.80
Mantle	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Recency	6 May 2015	5 September 2014
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---