RTX A5500 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M265DX
Aggregate performance score
RTX A5500 Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 M265DX by a whopping 2969% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 995 | 100 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2017) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | Topaz | GA103S |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 October 2014 (9 years ago) | 30 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 7424 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 22,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 165 Watt (80 - 165 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 | 365.4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R7 M265DX and RTX A5500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 16000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | no data | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 4−5
−3100%
| 128
+3100%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−3350%
| 69
+3350%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−5200%
| 53
+5200%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.29 | 39.59 |
| Recency | 12 October 2014 | 30 March 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 8 nm |
The RTX A5500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M265DX in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M265DX is a desktop card while RTX A5500 Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
