RX 6600 XT vs R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
2.72

RX 6600 XT outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 1462% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking76378
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Value for moneyno data46.77
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameKaveri SpectreNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years old)30 July 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Current priceno data$283 (0.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed720 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rateno data331.4

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 2.72
RX 6600 XT 42.48
+1462%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 1462% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 7338
RX 6600 XT 88163
+1101%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 1101% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1988
RX 6600 XT 39051
+1865%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 1865% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1406
RX 6600 XT 28342
+1917%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 1917% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 9651
RX 6600 XT 156297
+1520%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 1520% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 89954
RX 6600 XT 472371
+425%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 425% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−843%
132
+843%
1440p4−5
−1750%
74
+1750%
4K2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1480%
79
+1480%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1750%
70−75
+1750%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−867%
110−120
+867%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1460%
78
+1460%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3675%
151
+3675%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4267%
131
+4267%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1729%
120−130
+1729%
Hitman 3 5−6
−4320%
221
+4320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−3325%
137
+3325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1033%
65−70
+1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1744%
166
+1744%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−11900%
120
+11900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1750%
70−75
+1750%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−867%
110−120
+867%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1420%
76
+1420%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3425%
141
+3425%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4133%
127
+4133%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1729%
120−130
+1729%
Hitman 3 5−6
−3560%
183
+3560%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2625%
109
+2625%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2275%
95
+2275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1033%
65−70
+1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1478%
142
+1478%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2833%
176
+2833%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−10300%
104
+10300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1750%
70−75
+1750%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1280%
69
+1280%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3225%
133
+3225%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3633%
112
+3633%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1729%
120−130
+1729%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1550%
99
+1550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6000%
61
+6000%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1340%
70−75
+1340%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1767%
112
+1767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−660%
76
+660%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5500%
56
+5500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1300%
84
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2525%
105
+2525%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−9000%
90−95
+9000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−150%
20
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1175%
51
+1175%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−783%
53
+783%

This is how R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 843% faster than R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

1440p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 1750% faster than R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

4K resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 1950% faster than R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 11900% faster than the R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in all 53 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.72 42.48
Recency 14 January 2014 30 July 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 20 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3516 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.