R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs RX 6600 XT

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 65%
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed 720
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 4.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 1968
  • Max video memory 8192 MB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 16000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 688$
Games supported 100%
Graphics card Graphics card AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating50048
Value for moneyno data52.16
ArchitectureGCNNavi / RDNA2
GPU code nameKaveri SpectreNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 January 2014 (8 years ago)30 July 2021 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Price nowno data$688
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

no data
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed720 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)no data160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data331.4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.212.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.2

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 6.74
RX 6600 XT 58.83
+773%
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 9651
RX 6600 XT 156297
+1520%
R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1302
RX 6600 XT 25652
+1870%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1406
RX 6600 XT 28342
+1917%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1988
RX 6600 XT 39051
+1865%

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 7338
RX 6600 XT 88163
+1101%

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 89954
RX 6600 XT 472371
+425%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1080p14
−857%
134
+857%
1440pno data79
4Kno data44

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 6.74 58.83
Novelty 14 January 2014 30 July 2021
Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 2048
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

since it shows better performance.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 650, which is slower by 2% and lower by 1 position in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop):

Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 XT by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon RX 6600 XT's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce RTX 2070, which is faster by 3% and higher by 3 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600 XT:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


16 ratings
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
447 ratings
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.