Radeon R7 360 vs GeForce GTX 480
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Radeon R7 360 by 33% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 395 | 480 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 1.27 | 1.57 |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
GPU code name | GF100 | Tobago |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | no data | reference |
Release date | 7 December 2010 (13 years ago) | 18 June 2015 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $109 |
Current price | $15.99 (0x MSRP) | $13.98 (0.1x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
R7 360 has 24% better value for money than GTX 480.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 768 |
CUDA cores | 480 | no data |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1000 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 295 Watt | 100 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 42 billion/sec | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,345.0 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 165 mm |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
SLI options | + | no data |
Bridgeless CrossFire | no data | 1 |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
Eyefinity | no data | 1 |
Number of Eyefinity displays | no data | 6 |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
DisplayPort support | no data | + |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | no data | - |
CrossFire | no data | 1 |
Enduro | no data | - |
FreeSync | no data | 1 |
HD3D | no data | - |
PowerTune | no data | + |
TrueAudio | no data | + |
ZeroCore | no data | - |
VCE | no data | + |
DDMA audio | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX® 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | + |
Mantle | no data | + |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Radeon R7 360 by 33% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce GTX 480 outperforms Radeon R7 360 by 33% in Passmark.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Radeon R7 360 outperforms GeForce GTX 480 by 13% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+33.3%
|
27−30
−33.3%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+37%
|
27−30
−37%
|
Hitman 3 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+33.3%
|
27−30
−33.3%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+37%
|
27−30
−37%
|
Hitman 3 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+33.3%
|
27−30
−33.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+37%
|
27−30
−37%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
Hitman 3 | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
+40%
|
10−11
−40%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+41.7%
|
12−14
−41.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+37.5%
|
8−9
−37.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 10.59 | 7.98 |
Recency | 7 December 2010 | 18 June 2015 |
Cost | $499 | $109 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 295 Watt | 100 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 360 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.