GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs Radeon R7 350

Place in performance ranking	570	125
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.81	46.75
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	N18E-G2R
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	6 July 2016 (8 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$142	$812

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q has 5672% better value for money than R7 350.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2560
Core clock speed	800 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.60	184.8
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 350 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	11000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	352.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	no data	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −569%	107 +569%
1440p	10−12 −650%	75 +650%
4K	7−8 −571%	47 +571%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65
−465%

350−400

+465%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	99 −506%	600−650 +506%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	81 −517%	500−550 +517%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −509%	700−750 +509%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	101 −494%	600−650 +494%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −465%	350−400 +465%
Far Cry 5	127 −530%	800−850 +530%
Far Cry New Dawn	137 −520%	850−900 +520%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −507%	850−900 +507%
Hitman 3	103 −531%	650−700 +531%
Horizon Zero Dawn	163 −513%	1000−1050 +513%
Metro Exodus	144 −525%	900−950 +525%
Red Dead Redemption 2	109 −496%	650−700 +496%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −530%	850−900 +530%
Watch Dogs: Legion	96 −525%	600−650 +525%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	81 −517%	500−550 +517%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70 −471%	400−450 +471%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −509%	700−750 +509%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	91 −504%	550−600 +504%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −465%	350−400 +465%
Far Cry 5	108 −502%	650−700 +502%
Far Cry New Dawn	97 −519%	600−650 +519%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −507%	850−900 +507%
Hitman 3	51 −488%	300−310 +488%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −525%	900−950 +525%
Metro Exodus	121 −520%	750−800 +520%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 −512%	600−650 +512%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −530%	850−900 +530%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	142 −534%	900−950 +534%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −504%	550−600 +504%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 −465%	350−400 +465%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 −483%	350−400 +483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68 −488%	400−450 +488%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −465%	350−400 +465%
Far Cry 5	76 −492%	450−500 +492%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −507%	850−900 +507%
Horizon Zero Dawn	104 −525%	650−700 +525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −530%	850−900 +530%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75 −500%	450−500 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	59 −493%	350−400 +493%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

92
−498%

550−600

+498%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −488%	400−450 +488%
Far Cry New Dawn	109 −496%	650−700 +496%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	47 −538%	300−310 +538%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −515%	240−250 +515%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	61 −474%	350−400 +474%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −530%	170−180 +530%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −525%	400−450 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −508%	450−500 +508%
Hitman 3	45−50 −522%	280−290 +522%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −484%	450−500 +484%
Metro Exodus	75 −500%	450−500 +500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −488%	500−550 +488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −500%	300−310 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −513%	190−200 +513%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

71
−534%

450−500

+534%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −529%	220−230 +529%
Far Cry New Dawn	35 −529%	220−230 +529%
Hitman 3	27−30 −521%	180−190 +521%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −536%	280−290 +536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	36 −539%	230−240 +539%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 −488%	300−310 +488%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	32 −525%	200−210 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 −521%	180−190 +521%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Far Cry 5	28 −507%	170−180 +507%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −512%	300−310 +512%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −536%	280−290 +536%
Metro Exodus	44 −536%	280−290 +536%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −511%	110−120 +511%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

36
−539%

230−240

+539%

This is how R7 350 and RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 569% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 650% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 571% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.58	35.68
Recency	6 July 2016	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	80 Watt