GeForce GT 435M vs Radeon R7 350

Place in performance ranking	570	962
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.82	0.20
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	N11P-GT
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	6 July 2016 (7 years ago)	3 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Current price	$142	$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 350 has 310% better value for money than GT 435M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	96
CUDA cores	no data	96
Core clock speed	800 MHz	650 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.60	7.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops	249.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 350 and GeForce GT 435M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 API with Feature Level 12.1
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	75−80 +295%	19 −295%
Full HD	95−100 +296%	24 −296%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

+300%

4−5
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Hitman 3	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +293%	14−16 −293%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +275%	12−14 −275%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Hitman 3	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +293%	14−16 −293%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +275%	12−14 −275%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +293%	14−16 −293%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +275%	12−14 −275%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+300%

2−3

−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+300%

4−5
−300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%