Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon R6 (Carrizo)

Place in the ranking	969	261
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.99	23.88
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Carrizo	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	4 June 2015 (9 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1024
Core clock speed	no data	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	2410 Million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-35 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	114.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R6 (Carrizo) 1.51

T2000 Mobile 20.69
+1270%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R6 (Carrizo) 1438

T2000 Mobile 13524
+841%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1200%

130−140
+1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−725%

30−35
+725%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −667%	45−50 +667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −950%	40−45 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −725%	30−35 +725%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −3075%	120−130 +3075%
Hitman 3	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −560%	95−100 +560%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −763%	65−70 +763%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −182%	90−95 +182%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −667%	45−50 +667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −950%	40−45 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −725%	30−35 +725%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −3075%	120−130 +3075%
Hitman 3	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −560%	95−100 +560%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −763%	65−70 +763%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −229%	45−50 +229%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −182%	90−95 +182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −667%	45−50 +667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −950%	40−45 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −725%	30−35 +725%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −3075%	120−130 +3075%
Hitman 3	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −560%	95−100 +560%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −763%	65−70 +763%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −318%	45−50 +318%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −182%	90−95 +182%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1733%

55−60
+1733%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1500%	30−35 +1500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	21−24
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −1629%	120−130 +1629%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−750%

30−35
+750%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1500%

16−18
+1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	10−12
Far Cry 5	0−1	10−12

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−500%

18−20
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Hitman 3	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

This is how R6 (Carrizo) and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 1200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 3075% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.51	20.69
Recency	4 June 2015	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	60 Watt

R6 (Carrizo) has 400% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1270.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 (Carrizo) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.