Radeon Pro VII vs R5 M315
Aggregate performance score
Pro VII outperforms R5 M315 by a whopping 2578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1007 | 149 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.34 |
| Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Meso LE (DDR3) | Vega 20 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 13 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,899 |
| Current price | no data | $2378 (1.3x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 3840 |
| Compute units | 5 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 970 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1700 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 13,230 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 23.28 | 408.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 745.0 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R5 M315 and Radeon Pro VII compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 305 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 1024 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | - | no data |
| Enduro | - | no data |
| HD3D | + | no data |
| PowerTune | + | no data |
| DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
| TrueAudio | - | no data |
| ZeroCore | + | no data |
| Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.3 |
| Mantle | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Pro VII outperforms R5 M315 by 2578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Pro VII outperforms R5 M315 by 2568% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−2567%
|
160−170
+2567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−2400%
|
100−105
+2400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−2400%
|
300−310
+2400%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−2567%
|
240−250
+2567%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−2567%
|
160−170
+2567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−2400%
|
100−105
+2400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−2400%
|
300−310
+2400%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−2567%
|
240−250
+2567%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−2400%
|
100−105
+2400%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−2567%
|
160−170
+2567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−2400%
|
300−310
+2400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−2400%
|
100−105
+2400%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−2400%
|
100−105
+2400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
4K
High Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−2567%
|
160−170
+2567%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−2400%
|
100−105
+2400%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−2567%
|
80−85
+2567%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.23 | 32.94 |
| Recency | 16 June 2015 | 13 May 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
The Radeon Pro VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M315 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R5 M315 is a notebook card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
