Radeon 740M vs R5 (Kaveri)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Kaveri) and Radeon 740M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R5 (Kaveri)
2014
1.21

740M outperforms R5 (Kaveri) by a whopping 586% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1054500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameKaveriPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256256
Core clock speed514 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed626 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data40.00
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%
Hitman 3 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−84.4%
55−60
+84.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%
Hitman 3 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−84.4%
55−60
+84.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%
Hitman 3 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−84.4%
55−60
+84.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 8−9
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1020%
55−60
+1020%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 6−7

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 5−6

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 740M is 2850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 8.30
Recency 4 June 2014 23 May 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

Radeon 740M has a 586% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Kaveri) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Kaveri) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 44 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.