Radeon PRO V710 vs R5 (Carrizo)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking911not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.76no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCarrizoNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2015 (9 years ago)3 October 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563456
Core clock speedno data1900 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rateno data432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data28 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2015 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 158 Watt

R5 (Carrizo) has 1216.7% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Carrizo) and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.