Intel HD Graphics 610 vs AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

Price now no data

Games supported 57%

Price now 86$

Games supported 57%

Questions and comments

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rating	829	812
Value for money	no data	0.21
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	Gen. 9 Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
GPU code name	Carrizo	Kaby Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 June 2015 (7 years old)	1 January 2017 (6 years old)
Current price	no data	$86

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	12
Core clock speed	no data	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	950 MHz
Number of transistors	2410 Million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	12-35 Watt	5 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	3.600
Floating-point performance	no data	422.4 gflops

Dimensions and compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 (Carrizo) and HD Graphics 610 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	no data	32 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	no data	1.1.103

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 (Carrizo) 1.70

HD Graphics 610 1.79
+5.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

R5 (Carrizo) 1711
+94.4%

HD Graphics 610 880

Radeon R5 (Carrizo) outperforms HD Graphics 610 by 94% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R5 (Carrizo) 5804
+9.9%

HD Graphics 610 5281

Radeon R5 (Carrizo) outperforms HD Graphics 610 by 10% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R5 (Carrizo) 898
+58.7%

HD Graphics 610 566

Radeon R5 (Carrizo) outperforms HD Graphics 610 by 59% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R5 (Carrizo) 1001
+64.8%

HD Graphics 610 608

Radeon R5 (Carrizo) outperforms HD Graphics 610 by 65% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

no data

Popular games

Full HD
Low Preset
Full HD
Medium Preset
Full HD
High Preset
Full HD
Ultra Preset
1440p
High Preset
1440p
Ultra Preset
4K
High Preset
4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

+0%

5−6

+0%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3 +50%
Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −200%	3 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	1−2

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating	1.70	1.79
Recency	4 June 2015	1 January 2017
Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	12
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	12 Watt	5 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

and

HD Graphics 610

The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

HD Graphics 610

Competitors of Radeon R5 (Carrizo) by NVIDIA

According to our data, the closest equivalent to Radeon R5 (Carrizo) by NVIDIA is GeForce GT 640M LE, which is slower by 1% and lower by 1 position in our rating.