Radeon R5 (Carrizo) vs PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO W7500 PRO W7600 PRO W7700 PRO W7800 PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Beema/Carrizo-L) (Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) (Stoney Ridge) A230 A330 A335 M230 M230 Rebrand M240 M240 Rebrand M255 M315 M320 M330 M335 M420 M430 M435 Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 with Radeon R5 (Carrizo), including specs and performance data.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
31.89
+1787%

PRO W7500 outperforms R5 (Carrizo) by a whopping 1787% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
PRO W7500 PRO W7500
R5 (Carrizo) R5 (Carrizo)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking183963
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.01no data
Power efficiency34.723.68
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameNavi 33Carrizo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)4 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792256
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1700 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt12-35 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4no data
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
God of War 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
God of War 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
God of War 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.89 1.69
Recency 3 August 2023 4 June 2015
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 12 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 1787% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

R5 (Carrizo), on the other hand, has 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
L20 L20
R5 (Carrizo) Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
K3000M Quadro K3000M
RTX 4070 Ti GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
P520 Max-Q Quadro P520 Max-Q
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
L4 L4
vs
RX 7900M RX 7900M
RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070
vs
RX 7900 GRE RX 7900 GRE
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU 8 core GPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
HD 7420G HD 7420G
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
GTS 160M GTS 160M
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 22 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or Radeon R5 (Carrizo), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.