RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

Place in performance ranking	774	15
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Oland	Ada Lovelace
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 June 2016 (8 years ago)	3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,799
Current price	no data	$9290 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	18176
Core clock speed	730 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	780 MHz	2505 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.72	1,423
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	8.9
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 bit Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	36.8 GB/s	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 430 OEM 2.67

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 73.10
+2638%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Radeon R5 430 OEM by 2638% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R5 430 OEM 1031

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28230
+2638%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Radeon R5 430 OEM by 2638% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −2671%	194 +2671%
1440p	5−6 −3120%	161 +3120%
4K	4−5 −2850%	118 +2850%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −2616%	3150−3200 +2616%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −2613%	3500−3550 +2613%
Battlefield 5	230−240 −2623%	6400−6450 +2623%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −2608%	3250−3300 +2608%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −2612%	3200−3250 +2612%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 −2622%	4900−4950 +2622%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 −2621%	6150−6200 +2621%
Hitman 3	120−130 −2624%	3350−3400 +2624%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−350 −2635%	8450−8500 +2635%
Metro Exodus	140−150 −2624%	3950−4000 +2624%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −2602%	3350−3400 +2602%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 −2626%	9350−9400 +2626%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −2617%	3750−3800 +2617%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −2616%	3150−3200 +2616%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −2613%	3500−3550 +2613%
Battlefield 5	230−240 −2623%	6400−6450 +2623%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −2608%	3250−3300 +2608%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −2612%	3200−3250 +2612%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 −2622%	4900−4950 +2622%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 −2621%	6150−6200 +2621%
Hitman 3	120−130 −2624%	3350−3400 +2624%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−350 −2635%	8450−8500 +2635%
Metro Exodus	55 −2627%	1500−1550 +2627%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −2602%	3350−3400 +2602%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 −2626%	9350−9400 +2626%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	489 −2630%	13350−13400 +2630%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −2617%	3750−3800 +2617%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −2616%	3150−3200 +2616%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −2613%	3500−3550 +2613%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −2608%	3250−3300 +2608%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −2612%	3200−3250 +2612%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 −2621%	6150−6200 +2621%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−350 −2635%	8450−8500 +2635%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 −2626%	9350−9400 +2626%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	260 −2631%	7100−7150 +2631%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −2617%	3750−3800 +2617%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

−2602%

3350−3400
+2602%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 −2611%	4500−4550 +2611%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 −2608%	3900−3950 +2608%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −2633%	2350−2400 +2633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −2617%	2500−2550 +2617%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −2606%	2950−3000 +2606%
Far Cry 5	118 −2612%	3200−3250 +2612%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −2637%	4900−4950 +2637%
Hitman 3	100−110 −2610%	2900−2950 +2610%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −2625%	5150−5200 +2625%
Metro Exodus	99 −2627%	2700−2750 +2627%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 −2636%	5800−5850 +2636%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	219 −2617%	5950−6000 +2617%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −2583%	2200−2250 +2583%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−2612%

3200−3250
+2612%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 −2627%	2400−2450 +2627%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −2581%	1850−1900 +2581%
Hitman 3	65−70 −2592%	1750−1800 +2592%
Horizon Zero Dawn	173 −2617%	4700−4750 +2617%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	128 −2634%	3500−3550 +2634%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	184 −2617%	5000−5050 +2617%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −2561%	1650−1700 +2561%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −2572%	1550−1600 +2572%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −2592%	1400−1450 +2592%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −2600%	1350−1400 +2600%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −2610%	3550−3600 +2610%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −2596%	3100−3150 +2596%
Metro Exodus	98 −2604%	2650−2700 +2604%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −2608%	1300−1350 +2608%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
−2616%

2200−2250

+2616%

This is how R5 430 OEM and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 2671% faster in 1080p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 3120% faster in 1440p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 2850% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.67	73.10
Recency	30 June 2016	3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	300 Watt