RTX A4500 vs Radeon R4 (Beema)

Place in performance ranking	1066	36
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	5.15
Architecture	GCN 1.1 (2014)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Beema	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)	23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price	no data	$2591

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	7168
Core clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	369.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R4 (Beema) and RTX A4500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	20 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	640.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	no data	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R4 (Beema) 1.03

RTX A4500 56.31
+5367%

RTX A4500 outperforms Radeon R4 (Beema) by 5367% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R4 (Beema) 399

RTX A4500 21785
+5360%

RTX A4500 outperforms Radeon R4 (Beema) by 5360% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−4900%

400−450
+4900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−5233%

160−170

+5233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −4900%	300−310 +4900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −5150%	210−220 +5150%
Hitman 3	4−5 −5150%	210−220 +5150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −5317%	650−700 +5317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −4900%	450−500 +4900%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −4900%	300−310 +4900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −5150%	210−220 +5150%
Hitman 3	4−5 −5150%	210−220 +5150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −5317%	650−700 +5317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −4900%	450−500 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −4900%	300−310 +4900%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −5150%	210−220 +5150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −5317%	650−700 +5317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −5233%	160−170 +5233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−4900%

50−55
+4900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −5150%	210−220 +5150%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −5150%	210−220 +5150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%