Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Aggregated performance score
Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) by 4757% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1062 | 53 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | no data | 9.69 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Stoney Ridge | TU102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (7 years ago) | 13 August 2018 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,999 |
| Current price | no data | $3230 (0.3x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 260 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 509.8 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and Quadro RTX 8000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−4344%
|
400−450
+4344%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−4186%
|
300−310
+4186%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−4344%
|
400−450
+4344%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−4186%
|
300−310
+4186%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−4650%
|
190−200
+4650%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−4650%
|
190−200
+4650%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−4275%
|
350−400
+4275%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−4700%
|
240−250
+4700%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−4650%
|
95−100
+4650%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−4186%
|
300−310
+4186%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−4700%
|
240−250
+4700%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 1.03 | 50.03 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 13 August 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 260 Watt |
The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
