UHD Graphics P750 vs Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) with UHD Graphics P750, including specs and performance data.

R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
2014
0.65

UHD Graphics P750 outperforms R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) by a whopping 602% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1189652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.20
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameBeema/MullinsRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128256
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data83.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Hitman 3 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 4.56
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics P750 has a 601.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics P750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics P750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Intel UHD Graphics P750
UHD Graphics P750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.