Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro WX 4150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.85

T1200 Mobile outperforms Pro WX 4150 by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking560287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.3974.08
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBaffinTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961024
Core clock speed1002 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate58.9791.20
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs5664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−222%
58
+222%
1440p10−12
−230%
33
+230%
4K27−30
−200%
81
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−159%
40−45
+159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−422%
47
+422%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−333%
65
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−179%
50−55
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−173%
120−130
+173%
Hitman 3 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−50%
60
+50%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−179%
50−55
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−157%
59
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−1.9%
54
+1.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−159%
40−45
+159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−211%
28
+211%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−293%
59
+293%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−179%
50−55
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−173%
120−130
+173%
Hitman 3 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−17.5%
47
+17.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−263%
65−70
+263%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−179%
50−55
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−91.3%
44
+91.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−238%
71
+238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+12.8%
47
−12.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−159%
40−45
+159%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−133%
21
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−273%
56
+273%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−173%
120−130
+173%
Hitman 3 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−183%
65−70
+183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−76.2%
37
+76.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+179%
19
−179%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−800%
18
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−413%
41
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−383%
110−120
+383%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+258%
12
−258%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Hitman 3 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−415%
100−110
+415%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 222% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 230% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 258% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.85 19.45
Recency 1 March 2017 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 183.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 144 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.