Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	564	493
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.64	34.59
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Baffin	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	896
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	94.92
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	56	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 −33.3%	36 +33.3%
1440p	10−12 −50%	15 +50%
4K	12−14 −41.7%	17 +41.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −31.8%	27−30 +31.8%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +75%	8 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −28.6%	35−40 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −37.5%	21−24 +37.5%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Valorant	24−27 −41.7%	30−35 +41.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −31.8%	27−30 +31.8%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +133%	6 −133%
Dota 2	24−27 −275%	90 +275%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +10.7%	28 −10.7%
Fortnite	40−45 −29.3%	50−55 +29.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −28.6%	35−40 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −37.5%	21−24 +37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −29.2%	31 +29.2%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −24.6%	70−75 +24.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −27.3%	28 +27.3%
Valorant	24−27 −41.7%	30−35 +41.7%
World of Tanks	100−110 −23.1%	130−140 +23.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −31.8%	27−30 +31.8%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +180%	5 −180%
Dota 2	24−27 −213%	75 +213%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +14.8%	27 −14.8%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −28.6%	35−40 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −24.6%	70−75 +24.6%
Valorant	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Dota 2	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
World of Tanks	50−55 −20%	60−65 +20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −42.9%	20−22 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Valorant	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +28.6%	14 −28.6%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Dota 2	18−20 −55.6%	28 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Fortnite	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Valorant	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5	30 +0%	30 +0%
Fortnite	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

50−55

+0%

50−55

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Valorant	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

T500 Mobile is 33% faster in 1080p
T500 Mobile is 50% faster in 1440p
T500 Mobile is 42% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 180% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T500 Mobile is 275% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 6 tests (11%)
T500 Mobile is ahead in 36 tests (67%)
there's a draw in 12 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.83	8.82
Recency	1 March 2017	2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	18 Watt

Pro WX 4150 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 29.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.