GeForce 8800 GT vs Radeon Pro WX 4150

Place in performance ranking	534	997
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.47	0.02
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Polaris 11	G92
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	29 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$349
Current price	$2000	$166 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 4150 has 2250% better value for money than 8800 GT.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	112
CUDA cores	no data	112
Core clock speed	no data	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,000 million	754 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	58.97	33.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	no data	336.0 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 4150 and GeForce 8800 GT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	9" (22.9 cm)
Height	no data	Single Slot
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	6-pin & 8-pin
SLI options	no data	2-way

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	57.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor support	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	no data
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)	no data	128bit

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.53
+427%

8800 GT 1.24

Radeon Pro WX 4150 outperforms GeForce 8800 GT by 427% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 4150 2528
+426%

8800 GT 481

Radeon Pro WX 4150 outperforms GeForce 8800 GT by 426% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11
+900%

1−2

−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Hitman 3	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Hitman 3	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Metro Exodus	5−6	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	6.53	1.24
Recency	1 March 2017	29 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	105 Watt