GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4130 with GeForce FX 5700 Ultra, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4130
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
5.62
+6144%

Pro WX 4130 outperforms FX 5700 Ultra by a whopping 6144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6001462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.830.14
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameBaffinNV36
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)23 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1002 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1053 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt46 Watt
Texture fill rate42.121.900
Floating-point processing power1.348 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz453 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s14.5 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4130 5.62
+6144%
FX 5700 Ultra 0.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4130 2168
+6276%
FX 5700 Ultra 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Hitman 3 9−10 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 0.09
Recency 1 March 2017 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 46 Watt

Pro WX 4130 has a 6144.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Ultra, on the other hand, has 8.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX 4130
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.