Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Pro W6800

Place in the ranking	54	80
Place by popularity	not in top-100	82
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.48	78.17
Power efficiency	14.19	16.19
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 21	Navi 33
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,249	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 7600 XT has 207% better value for money than Pro W6800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	2048
Core clock speed	2075 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	2320 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	556.8	352.6
Floating-point processing power	17.82 TFLOPS	22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	240	128
Ray Tracing Cores	60	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	204 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6800 50.23
+15.3%

RX 7600 XT 43.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6800 19832
+15.3%

RX 7600 XT 17200

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	157 +20.8%	130−140 −20.8%
1440p	120 +20%	100−110 −20%
4K	93 +16.3%	80−85 −16.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	14.32 −466%	2.53 +466%
1440p	18.74 −470%	3.29 +470%
4K	24.18 −488%	4.11 +488%

RX 7600 XT has 466% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 7600 XT has 470% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 7600 XT has 488% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +16%	100−105 −16%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +20%	95−100 −20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +16%	100−105 −16%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +16%	100−105 −16%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +20%	95−100 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	282 +17.5%	240−250 −17.5%
Forza Horizon 5	130−140 +18.2%	110−120 −18.2%
Metro Exodus	61 +22%	50−55 −22%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +20%	80−85 −20%
Valorant	210−220 +21.1%	180−190 −21.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +16%	100−105 −16%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +16%	100−105 −16%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +20%	95−100 −20%
Dota 2	114 +20%	95−100 −20%
Far Cry 5	45 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Fortnite	200−210 +15.6%	180−190 −15.6%
Forza Horizon 4	277 +15.4%	240−250 −15.4%
Forza Horizon 5	130−140 +18.2%	110−120 −18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	121 +21%	100−105 −21%
Metro Exodus	116 +16%	100−105 −16%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +19.4%	180−190 −19.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +20%	80−85 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +16%	150−160 −16%
Valorant	210−220 +21.1%	180−190 −21.1%
World of Tanks	270−280 +16.3%	240−250 −16.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +16%	100−105 −16%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +16%	100−105 −16%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +20%	95−100 −20%
Dota 2	86 +22.9%	70−75 −22.9%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +17.9%	95−100 −17.9%
Forza Horizon 4	268 +16.5%	230−240 −16.5%
Forza Horizon 5	130−140 +18.2%	110−120 −18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +19.4%	180−190 −19.4%
Valorant	210−220 +21.1%	180−190 −21.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	88 +17.3%	75−80 −17.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	88 +17.3%	75−80 −17.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +16.7%	150−160 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +24.4%	45−50 −24.4%
World of Tanks	300−350 +18.2%	280−290 −18.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +20%	70−75 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +18%	50−55 −18%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +22.3%	130−140 −22.3%
Forza Horizon 4	212 +17.8%	180−190 −17.8%
Forza Horizon 5	90−95 +20%	75−80 −20%
Metro Exodus	55 +22.2%	45−50 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +18.8%	85−90 −18.8%
Valorant	180−190 +15.6%	160−170 −15.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Dota 2	125 +25%	100−105 −25%
Grand Theft Auto V	125 +25%	100−105 −25%
Metro Exodus	55 +22.2%	45−50 −22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +18%	150−160 −18%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	125 +25%	100−105 −25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +16.4%	55−60 −16.4%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Dota 2	94 +17.5%	80−85 −17.5%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +16%	75−80 −16%
Fortnite	80−85 +18.6%	70−75 −18.6%
Forza Horizon 4	126 +26%	100−105 −26%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +17.8%	45−50 −17.8%
Valorant	100−110 +20%	85−90 −20%

This is how Pro W6800 and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

Pro W6800 is 21% faster in 1080p
Pro W6800 is 20% faster in 1440p
Pro W6800 is 16% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	50.23	43.56
Recency	8 June 2021	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	190 Watt