Radeon Vega 7 vs Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
24.68
+231%

Pro W6600M outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221529
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Power efficiency18.9611.46
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23Cezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792448
Core clock speed1224 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate227.853.20
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs11228
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+226%
23
−226%
1440p110−120
+206%
36
−206%
4K65−70
+225%
20
−225%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+257%
21−24
−257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+280%
30−33
−280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+238%
21−24
−238%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+271%
21−24
−271%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+267%
24−27
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+262%
50−55
−262%
Hitman 3 70−75
+252%
21−24
−252%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+233%
45−50
−233%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+231%
35−40
−231%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+254%
24−27
−254%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+260%
35−40
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+249%
35−40
−249%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+257%
21−24
−257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+280%
30−33
−280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+238%
21−24
−238%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+271%
21−24
−271%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+267%
24−27
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+262%
50−55
−262%
Hitman 3 70−75
+252%
21−24
−252%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+233%
45−50
−233%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+231%
35−40
−231%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+254%
24−27
−254%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+260%
35−40
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+248%
21−24
−248%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+249%
35−40
−249%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+257%
21−24
−257%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+238%
21−24
−238%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+271%
21−24
−271%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+262%
50−55
−262%
Hitman 3 70−75
+252%
21−24
−252%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+233%
45−50
−233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+260%
35−40
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+248%
21−24
−248%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+249%
35−40
−249%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+254%
24−27
−254%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+272%
18−20
−272%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+238%
16−18
−238%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+280%
10−11
−280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+280%
10−11
−280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+242%
12−14
−242%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+271%
7−8
−271%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+242%
12−14
−242%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+233%
60−65
−233%
Hitman 3 40−45
+267%
12−14
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+257%
21−24
−257%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+267%
18−20
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+246%
24−27
−246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+250%
14−16
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+258%
50−55
−258%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Hitman 3 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+238%
50−55
−238%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+258%
12−14
−258%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+242%
12−14
−242%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+243%
14−16
−243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%

This is how Pro W6600M and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 226% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600M is 206% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6600M is 225% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.68 7.46
Recency 8 June 2021 13 April 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 45 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 230.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Vega 7 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1897 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.