Radeon RX 7600S vs Pro W6600M

Place in performance ranking	140	125
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Navi 23	Navi 33
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	8 June 2021 (2 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	1792
Boost clock speed	2903 MHz	1865 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	75 Watt (50 - 75 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	325.1	224.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro W6600M and Radeon RX 7600S compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600M 35.01

RX 7600S 36.33
+3.8%

RX 7600S outperforms Pro W6600M by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W6600M 13549

RX 7600S 14061
+3.8%

RX 7600S outperforms Pro W6600M by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −6%	106 +6%
1440p	50−55 −14%	57 +14%
4K	27−30 −7.4%	29 +7.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

−3.3%

60−65
+3.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −3.1%	65−70 +3.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −103%	124 +103%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −2.9%	100−110 +2.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −4.2%	95−100 +4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −68.9%	103 +68.9%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −23.3%	111 +23.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −3.5%	85−90 +3.5%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −2.7%	110−120 +2.7%
Hitman 3	110−120 −61.8%	178 +61.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −2.6%	75−80 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −3.6%	55−60 +3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −4.8%	85−90 +4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −80.3%	119 +80.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −3.1%	65−70 +3.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −67.2%	102 +67.2%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −2.9%	100−110 +2.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −4.2%	95−100 +4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −37.7%	84 +37.7%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −18.9%	107 +18.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −3.5%	85−90 +3.5%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −2.7%	110−120 +2.7%
Hitman 3	110−120 −38.2%	152 +38.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −2.6%	75−80 +2.6%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +59%	39 −59%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −3.6%	55−60 +3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −4.8%	85−90 +4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −84.9%	159 +84.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −62.1%	107 +62.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −3.1%	65−70 +3.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −44.3%	88 +44.3%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −2.9%	100−110 +2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −14.8%	70 +14.8%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −13.3%	102 +13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −3.5%	85−90 +3.5%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −2.7%	110−120 +2.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −10.5%	95 +10.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −6.1%	70 +6.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −3.5%	55−60 +3.5%
Hitman 3	60−65 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −5.9%	50−55 +5.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −2.7%	75−80 +2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −65.4%	43 +65.4%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −3%	65−70 +3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −4.1%	75−80 +4.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −6.3%	50−55 +6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −6.7%	30−35 +6.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −6.7%	30−35 +6.7%
Hitman 3	30−35 −5.9%	35−40 +5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −3.7%	27−30 +3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −4.9%	40−45 +4.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −2.3%	40−45 +2.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −63.6%	18 +63.6%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −6.3%	30−35 +6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −2.8%	35−40 +2.8%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −4.1%	50−55 +4.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

This is how Pro W6600M and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

RX 7600S is 6% faster than Pro W6600M in 1080p
RX 7600S is 14% faster than Pro W6600M in 1440p
RX 7600S is 7.4% faster than Pro W6600M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 59% faster than the RX 7600S.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600S is 103% faster than the Pro W6600M.

All in all, in popular games: