Radeon RX 9070 XT vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q
VS
Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 9060 XT Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile with Radeon RX 9070 XT, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
16.71

RX 9070 XT outperforms T1200 Mobile by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.74
Power efficiency73.6815.52
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 48
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244096
Core clock speed855 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rate91.20760.3
Floating-point processing power2.918 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs64256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−245%
200−210
+245%
1440p33
−233%
110−120
+233%
4K81
−246%
280−290
+246%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.00
1440pno data5.45
4Kno data2.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−128%
170−180
+128%
Far Cry 5 65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Fortnite 95−100
−211%
300−350
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−242%
250−260
+242%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−221%
180−190
+221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−160%
170−180
+160%
Valorant 130−140
−162%
350−400
+162%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−128%
170−180
+128%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−24.1%
270−280
+24.1%
Dota 2 114
−251%
400−450
+251%
Far Cry 5 59
−193%
170−180
+193%
Fortnite 95−100
−211%
300−350
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−242%
250−260
+242%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−221%
180−190
+221%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
−135%
160−170
+135%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−318%
160−170
+318%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−160%
170−180
+160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−276%
260−270
+276%
Valorant 130−140
−162%
350−400
+162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−128%
170−180
+128%
Dota 2 107
−227%
350−400
+227%
Far Cry 5 56
−209%
170−180
+209%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−242%
250−260
+242%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−160%
170−180
+160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−622%
260−270
+622%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−211%
300−350
+211%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−275%
450−500
+275%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−265%
130−140
+265%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−370%
100−110
+370%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−233%
100−105
+233%
Valorant 170−180
−152%
400−450
+152%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−216%
160−170
+216%
Far Cry 5 41
−276%
150−160
+276%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−372%
210−220
+372%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−260%
150−160
+260%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−373%
150−160
+373%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−367%
70−75
+367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−404%
130−140
+404%
Valorant 100−110
−221%
300−350
+221%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−337%
110−120
+337%
Dota 2 109
−221%
350−400
+221%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−410%
100−110
+410%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−428%
160−170
+428%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−433%
95−100
+433%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−339%
75−80
+339%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how T1200 Mobile and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 245% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT is 233% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT is 246% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 9070 XT is 622% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is ahead in 41 test (68%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (32%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.71 59.46
Recency 12 April 2021 6 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 304 Watt

T1200 Mobile has 1588.9% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 XT, on the other hand, has a 255.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
RX 9070 XT Radeon RX 9070 XT
vs
RTX 3080 12 GB GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580 Radeon Pro 580
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
T1000 T1000
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
T1000 T1000
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
T1000 T1000
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 958 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T1200 Mobile or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.