GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
27.57

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms Pro W6600M by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking22058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.0263.52
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 23GB205
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17925888
Core clock speed1224 MHz847 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz1447 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8266.2
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS17.04 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs112184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Cores2846

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro W6600M 27.57
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 53.03
+92.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 11287
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 21711
+92.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−80.3%
110−120
+80.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−90.5%
200−210
+90.5%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−80.3%
110−120
+80.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%
Fortnite 130−140
−92.3%
250−260
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−85.2%
200−210
+85.2%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−83.9%
160−170
+83.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−83.5%
200−210
+83.5%
Valorant 180−190
−66.7%
300−310
+66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−90.5%
200−210
+90.5%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−91.1%
300−310
+91.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−85.9%
500−550
+85.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−80.3%
110−120
+80.3%
Dota 2 120−130
−86%
240−250
+86%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%
Fortnite 130−140
−92.3%
250−260
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−85.2%
200−210
+85.2%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−83.9%
160−170
+83.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
−83.7%
180−190
+83.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−77.4%
110−120
+77.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−83.5%
200−210
+83.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Valorant 180−190
−66.7%
300−310
+66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−90.5%
200−210
+90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−80.3%
110−120
+80.3%
Dota 2 120−130
−86%
240−250
+86%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−85.2%
200−210
+85.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−83.5%
200−210
+83.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−88.2%
160−170
+88.2%
Valorant 180−190
−66.7%
300−310
+66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−92.3%
250−260
+92.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−82.3%
350−400
+82.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−86.3%
95−100
+86.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−71.4%
300−310
+71.4%
Valorant 210−220
−82.6%
400−450
+82.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−86.7%
140−150
+86.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−78.6%
50−55
+78.6%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−87.5%
120−130
+87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−80.6%
130−140
+80.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Valorant 160−170
−84%
300−310
+84%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−86%
80−85
+86%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Dota 2 85−90
−83.9%
160−170
+83.9%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−83.7%
90−95
+83.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.57 53.03
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 92.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 89 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600M or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.