GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5700

Place in the ranking	113	190
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	45.43	100.00
Power efficiency	13.20	25.17
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 10	TU116
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	19 November 2019 (4 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 120% better value for money than Pro W5700.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1536
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	1455 MHz
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz	1590 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	277.9	152.6
Floating-point processing power	8.893 TFLOPS	4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	144	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	305 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 +27.9%	86 −27.9%
1440p	75−80 +33.9%	56 −33.9%
4K	45−50 +25%	36 −25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	7.26	2.66
1440p	10.65	4.09
4K	17.76	6.36

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80 +0%	80 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +0%	66 +0%
Battlefield 5	129 +0%	129 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	82 +0%	82 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	68 +0%	68 +0%
Far Cry 5	98 +0%	98 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	102 +0%	102 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	304 +0%	304 +0%
Hitman 3	77 +0%	77 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	209 +0%	209 +0%
Metro Exodus	126 +0%	126 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	99 +0%	99 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	155 +0%	155 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	225 +0%	225 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	125 +0%	125 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +0%	49 +0%
Battlefield 5	109 +0%	109 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	73 +0%	73 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +0%	54 +0%
Far Cry 5	77 +0%	77 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	70 +0%	70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	256 +0%	256 +0%
Hitman 3	74 +0%	74 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	207 +0%	207 +0%
Metro Exodus	104 +0%	104 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	83 +0%	83 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	118 +0%	118 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	214 +0%	214 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 +0%	53 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	42 +0%	42 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +0%	53 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 +0%	52 +0%
Far Cry 5	57 +0%	57 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	99 +0%	99 +0%
Hitman 3	63 +0%	63 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90 +0%	90 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	101 +0%	101 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55 +0%	55 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	33 +0%	33 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	66 +0%	66 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +0%	46 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	36 +0%	36 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 +0%	32 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38 +0%	38 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +0%	25 +0%
Far Cry 5	36 +0%	36 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	182 +0%	182 +0%
Hitman 3	41 +0%	41 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65 +0%	65 +0%
Metro Exodus	60 +0%	60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	203 +0%	203 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	31 +0%	31 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	25 +0%	25 +0%
Hitman 3	25 +0%	25 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	76 +0%	76 +0%
Metro Exodus	41 +0%	41 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +0%	35 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	22 +0%	22 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 +0%	13 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	19 +0%	19 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Far Cry 5	18 +0%	18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	13 +0%	13 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

This is how Pro W5700 and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

Pro W5700 is 28% faster in 1080p
Pro W5700 is 34% faster in 1440p
Pro W5700 is 25% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	38.97	29.00
Recency	19 November 2019	23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	80 Watt

Pro W5700 has a 34.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has 156.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.