Radeon Pro W6800X vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile with Radeon Pro W6800X, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
20.23

Pro W6800X outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking272102
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.24
Power efficiency27.7413.84
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU116Navi 21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2020 (4 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243840
Core clock speed1350 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHz2087 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate95.04500.9
Floating-point processing power3.041 TFLOPS16.03 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataApple MPX

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.23
Pro W6800X 40.37
+99.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
Pro W6800X 15556
+99.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
1440p47
−91.5%
90−95
+91.5%
4K22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data25.45
1440pno data31.10
4Kno data69.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 59
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
−96.7%
120−130
+96.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
−93.9%
95−100
+93.9%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−97%
130−140
+97%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
Far Cry 5 69
−88.4%
130−140
+88.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
−90.5%
160−170
+90.5%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−93.5%
240−250
+93.5%
Hitman 3 51
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
−93.4%
350−400
+93.4%
Metro Exodus 91
−97.8%
180−190
+97.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−94%
130−140
+94%
Watch Dogs: Legion 201
−99%
400−450
+99%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−88.9%
85−90
+88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
−87.5%
60−65
+87.5%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−97%
130−140
+97%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−91.5%
90−95
+91.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
Far Cry 5 58
−89.7%
110−120
+89.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−93.5%
240−250
+93.5%
Hitman 3 50
−90%
95−100
+90%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180
−94.4%
350−400
+94.4%
Metro Exodus 79
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
−86.7%
140−150
+86.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−88.9%
85−90
+88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 183
−91.3%
350−400
+91.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−80%
27−30
+80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
−93.5%
60−65
+93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%
Far Cry 5 39
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−93.5%
240−250
+93.5%
Hitman 3 43
−97.7%
85−90
+97.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
−87.5%
120−130
+87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 41
−95.1%
80−85
+95.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 26
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−94.7%
220−230
+94.7%
Hitman 3 28
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−95.1%
80−85
+95.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−95.1%
80−85
+95.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120
−91.7%
230−240
+91.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−97%
65−70
+97%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
−75%
35−40
+75%
Hitman 3 16
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 42
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−80%
45−50
+80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and Pro W6800X compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6800X is 90% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6800X is 91% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6800X is 82% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.23 40.37
Recency 23 April 2020 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 200 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 300% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X, on the other hand, has a 99.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6800X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6800X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
Radeon Pro W6800X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1670 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 20 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.