GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5500M

Place in performance ranking	583	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	81
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.88	18.35
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 14	N18P-G62
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$2381	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 1985% better value for money than Pro W5500M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	1024
Core clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	127.6	95.04

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro W5500M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5500M 5.20

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.19
+288%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro W5500M by 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro W5500M 2010

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+288%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro W5500M by 288% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −314%	58 +314%
1440p	12−14 −292%	47 +292%
4K	5−6 −360%	23 +360%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−321%

59
+321%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −336%	61 +336%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −308%	49 +308%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −313%	65−70 +313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −342%	53 +342%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −360%	46 +360%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −331%	69 +331%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −300%	84 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Hitman 3	12−14 −325%	51 +325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −326%	115 +326%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −333%	91 +333%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −340%	44 +340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −296%	95 +296%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −329%	60 +329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −360%	46 +360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −300%	32 +300%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −313%	65−70 +313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −292%	47 +292%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −300%	36 +300%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −314%	58 +314%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −321%	59 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Hitman 3	10−11 −350%	45 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −300%	180 +300%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −325%	68 +325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −320%	42 +320%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −317%	75 +317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −300%	72 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −307%	183 +307%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −350%	27 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −400%	15 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −343%	31 +343%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −325%	34 +325%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −290%	39 +290%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −300%	64 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −294%	63 +294%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −290%	39 +290%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −340%	22 +340%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−310%

41
+310%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −290%	35−40 +290%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −300%	16 +300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −325%	30−35 +325%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −300%	28 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −310%	40−45 +310%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −322%	35−40 +322%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −320%	40−45 +320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−313%

30−35

+313%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −300%	20 +300%
Hitman 3	4−5 −300%	16 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −317%	25 +317%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −300%	12 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%