Radeon RX 6800M vs RX 5600 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT with Radeon RX 6800M, including specs and performance data.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
35.27
+1.6%

RX 5600 XT outperforms RX 6800M by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking143147
Place by popularity80not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.20no data
Power efficiency16.2216.50
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 January 2020 (5 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1130 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2390 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate224.6382.4
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.27
+1.6%
RX 6800M 34.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13554
+1.6%
RX 6800M 13335

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5600 XT 31310
RX 6800M 40391
+29%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5600 XT 86004
+11.3%
RX 6800M 77244

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5600 XT 22058
RX 6800M 34199
+55%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600 XT 115838
RX 6800M 160859
+38.9%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600 XT 548796
+13.6%
RX 6800M 482999

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RX 5600 XT 98
RX 6800M 118
+19.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RX 5600 XT 135
+3.1%
RX 6800M 131

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RX 5600 XT 104
+168%
RX 6800M 39

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RX 5600 XT 166
RX 6800M 181
+8.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RX 5600 XT 85
RX 6800M 101
+19.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RX 5600 XT 71
+19.8%
RX 6800M 60

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RX 5600 XT 120
RX 6800M 141
+17.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RX 5600 XT 53
+1717%
RX 6800M 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

RX 5600 XT 197
RX 6800M 226
+14.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+0%
108
+0%
1440p62
−12.9%
70
+12.9%
4K36
−27.8%
46
+27.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.58no data
1440p4.50no data
4K7.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 77
+10%
70−75
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
−48.2%
123
+48.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1%
95−100
−1%
Counter-Strike 2 63
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
−50.7%
104
+50.7%
Forza Horizon 4 190
−22.1%
232
+22.1%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+40.7%
86
−40.7%
Metro Exodus 139
+44.8%
96
−44.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 112
+14.3%
98
−14.3%
Valorant 179
+29.7%
130−140
−29.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1%
95−100
−1%
Counter-Strike 2 53
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
−55.9%
92
+55.9%
Dota 2 146
+24.8%
117
−24.8%
Far Cry 5 66
+37.5%
48
−37.5%
Fortnite 150−160
+0.6%
150−160
−0.6%
Forza Horizon 4 158
−33.5%
211
+33.5%
Forza Horizon 5 91
−31.9%
120
+31.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+12.5%
112
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 94
+8%
87
−8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0.5%
190−200
−0.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 53
−62.3%
86
+62.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%
Valorant 87
−58.6%
130−140
+58.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0.4%
270−280
−0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1%
95−100
−1%
Counter-Strike 2 47
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−70%
85
+70%
Dota 2 168
+46.1%
115
−46.1%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 141
−27.7%
180
+27.7%
Forza Horizon 5 85
+4.9%
81
−4.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0.5%
190−200
−0.5%
Valorant 148
+7.2%
130−140
−7.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 61
−37.7%
84
+37.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
−37.7%
84
+37.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35
−51.4%
53
+51.4%
World of Tanks 220−230
+1.4%
220−230
−1.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Counter-Strike 2 29
−17.2%
30−35
+17.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−63.3%
49
+63.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Forza Horizon 4 97
−49.5%
145
+49.5%
Forza Horizon 5 59
+3.5%
55−60
−3.5%
Metro Exodus 88
+6%
83
−6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1.7%
55−60
−1.7%
Valorant 97
−7.2%
100−110
+7.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 19
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Dota 2 63
−34.9%
85
+34.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
−34.9%
85
+34.9%
Metro Exodus 30
−26.7%
38
+26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 23
−43.5%
33
+43.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−34.9%
85
+34.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−83.3%
22
+83.3%
Dota 2 99
+4.2%
95
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+2%
45−50
−2%
Fortnite 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−35.1%
77
+35.1%
Forza Horizon 5 30
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Valorant 38
−39.5%
50−55
+39.5%

This is how RX 5600 XT and RX 6800M compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • RX 6800M is 13% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800M is 28% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 46% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6800M is 84% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is ahead in 31 test (48%)
  • RX 6800M is ahead in 30 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.27 34.70
Recency 21 January 2020 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 145 Watt

RX 5600 XT has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 6800M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 3.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 5600 XT and Radeon RX 6800M.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2946 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 317 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.