Radeon RX 570 vs Pro Vega 64

Place in performance ranking	146	285
Place by popularity	not in top-100	24
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.14	15.31
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	Vega 10	Polaris 20 Ellesmere
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 June 2017 (7 years ago)	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$169
Current price	$6074	$114 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 570 has 615% better value for money than Pro Vega 64.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	2048
Core clock speed	1250 MHz	1168 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1244 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	159.2
Floating-point performance	11,059 gflops	5,095 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1572 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 64 33.53
+85.9%

RX 570 18.04

Pro Vega 64 outperforms RX 570 by 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 64 12949
+85.9%

RX 570 6967

Pro Vega 64 outperforms RX 570 by 86% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro Vega 64 71516
+116%

RX 570 33094

Pro Vega 64 outperforms RX 570 by 116% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pro Vega 64 74672
+84.5%

RX 570 40477

Pro Vega 64 outperforms RX 570 by 84% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	160−170 +83.9%	87 −83.9%
1440p	85−90 +80.9%	47 −80.9%
4K	55−60 +83.3%	30 −83.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30
+100%

14−16

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +107%	30−33 −107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
Battlefield 5	106 +92.7%	55−60 −92.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68 +94.3%	35−40 −94.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Far Cry 5	80 +100%	40−45 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	85 +88.9%	45−50 −88.9%
Forza Horizon 4	100 +100%	50−55 −100%
Hitman 3	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +103%	35−40 −103%
Metro Exodus	101 +102%	50−55 −102%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +108%	24−27 −108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +93.3%	30−33 −93.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	51 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
Battlefield 5	98 +96%	50−55 −96%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	63 +110%	30−33 −110%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Far Cry 5	69 +97.1%	35−40 −97.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	61 +103%	30−33 −103%
Forza Horizon 4	255 +96.2%	130−140 −96.2%
Hitman 3	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +103%	35−40 −103%
Metro Exodus	74 +111%	35−40 −111%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +108%	24−27 −108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +93.3%	30−33 −93.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	77 +92.5%	40−45 −92.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33 +106%	16−18 −106%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45 +87.5%	24−27 −87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Far Cry 5	46 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Forza Horizon 4	75 +87.5%	40−45 −87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +103%	35−40 −103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +93.3%	30−33 −93.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +105%	21−24 −105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+108%

24−27

−108%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	61 +103%	30−33 −103%
Far Cry New Dawn	55 +104%	27−30 −104%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29 +107%	14−16 −107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	37 +106%	18−20 −106%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Far Cry 5	46 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Forza Horizon 4	59 +96.7%	30−33 −96.7%
Hitman 3	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +106%	18−20 −106%
Metro Exodus	48 +100%	24−27 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +100%	18−20 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+87.5%

16−18

−87.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	21 +110%	10−11 −110%
Hitman 3	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 +90%	10−11 −90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +100%	14−16 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 +100%	10−11 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	15 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Forza Horizon 4	39 +117%	18−20 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +100%	10−11 −100%
Metro Exodus	26 +117%	12−14 −117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%