Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Pro Vega 64

Place in performance ranking	148	542
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	2.01	3.15
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	Vega 10	Polaris 12
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 June 2017 (6 years ago)	26 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199
Current price	$6074	$740 (3.7x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 3200 has 57% better value for money than Pro Vega 64.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	640
Core clock speed	1250 MHz	1082 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	12,500 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	345.6	41.44
Floating-point performance	11,059 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	IGP	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1572 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 64 33.54
+435%

Pro WX 3200 6.27

Pro Vega 64 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 435% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 64 12984
+435%

Pro WX 3200 2427

Pro Vega 64 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 435% in Passmark.