Radeon Pro 575 vs Pro Vega 64
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 156 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 9.27 | no data |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
GPU code name | Vega 10 | Polaris 20 |
Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 5 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1096 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 345.6 | 140.3 |
Floating-point processing power | 11.06 TFLOPS | 4.489 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 64 | 32 |
TMUs | 256 | 128 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Width | IGP | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Pros & cons summary
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
Pro Vega 64 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Pro 575, on the other hand, has 108.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.