Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.46no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096320
Core clock speed1250 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate345.628.00
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS0.896 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs25620
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed786 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.1.1251.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 320SP has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon Graphics 320SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 320SP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP
Radeon Graphics 320SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 320SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Radeon Graphics 320SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.