Playstation 5 GPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking149not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.02no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Oberon Plus
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (6 years ago)28 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499
Current price$6074 $39 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962304
Core clock speed1250 MHz2233 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2233 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6321.6
Floating-point performance11,059 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mm390 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1572 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 28 September 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 180 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Playstation 5 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while Playstation 5 GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
AMD Playstation 5 GPU
Playstation 5 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1538 votes

Rate Playstation 5 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.