GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64 with GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 64
2017
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
28.92

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Pro Vega 64 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17356
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.44
Power efficiency9.1818.12
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10GA104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964864
Core clock speed1250 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6253.1
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs256152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm242 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro Vega 64 28.92
RTX 3060 Ti 45.67
+57.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 64 12920
RTX 3060 Ti 20406
+57.9%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro Vega 64 71252
RTX 3060 Ti 109075
+53.1%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Pro Vega 64 73720
RTX 3060 Ti 115945
+57.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
−64.7%
140
+64.7%
1440p50−55
−58%
79
+58%
4K30−35
−63.3%
49
+63.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.85
1440pno data5.05
4Kno data8.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 344
+0%
344
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+0%
132
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 156
+0%
156
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 330
+0%
330
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200
+0%
200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 176
+0%
176
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 127
+0%
127
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 224
+0%
224
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 196
+0%
196
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 99
+0%
99
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185
+0%
185
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 81
+0%
81
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 274
+0%
274
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150
+0%
150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 57
+0%
57
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 107
+0%
107
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+0%
103
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how Pro Vega 64 and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 65% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 58% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 63% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.92 45.67
Recency 27 June 2017 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 57.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 64 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 22 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16691 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.