Radeon RX 560 vs Pro Vega 56

Place in performance ranking	162	435
Place by popularity	not in top-100	59
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.01	1.58
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Vega	Polaris 21
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	14 December 2017 (6 years ago)	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$99
Current price	$4999 (12.5x MSRP)	$381 (3.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 56 has 91% better value for money than RX 560.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	1024
Core clock speed	1247 MHz	1175 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1275 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	280.0	81.60
Floating-point performance	9,677 gflops	2,611 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	267 mm	170 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	786 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.95
+238%

RX 560 9.44

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX 560 by 238% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 56 12353
+239%

RX 560 3648

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX 560 by 239% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro Vega 56 62235
+231%

RX 560 18780

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX 560 by 231% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pro Vega 56 66083
+262%

RX 560 18272

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX 560 by 262% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	98 +180%	35 −180%
4K	60 +275%	16−18 −275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+286%

14−16

−286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +269%	16−18 −269%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +250%	16−18 −250%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +247%	30−33 −247%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +294%	18−20 −294%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +286%	14−16 −286%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +294%	18−20 −294%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +246%	24−27 −246%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +267%	27−30 −267%
Hitman 3	75−80 +276%	21−24 −276%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +280%	30−33 −280%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +267%	24−27 −267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +286%	21−24 −286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +243%	30−33 −243%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +269%	16−18 −269%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +269%	16−18 −269%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +250%	16−18 −250%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +247%	30−33 −247%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +294%	18−20 −294%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +286%	14−16 −286%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +294%	18−20 −294%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +246%	24−27 −246%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +267%	27−30 −267%
Hitman 3	75−80 +276%	21−24 −276%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +280%	30−33 −280%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +267%	24−27 −267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +286%	21−24 −286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +243%	30−33 −243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	116 +287%	30−33 −287%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +269%	16−18 −269%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +269%	16−18 −269%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +250%	16−18 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +294%	18−20 −294%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +286%	14−16 −286%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +294%	18−20 −294%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +267%	27−30 −267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +280%	30−33 −280%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +267%	24−27 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 +256%	18−20 −256%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +269%	16−18 −269%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+286%

21−24

−286%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +239%	18−20 −239%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +243%	21−24 −243%
Hitman 3	40−45 +267%	12−14 −267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +250%	10−11 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +283%	12−14 −283%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +256%	16−18 −256%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +261%	18−20 −261%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +278%	18−20 −278%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +239%	18−20 −239%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +252%	21−24 −252%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +250%	12−14 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	55−60 +244%	16−18 −244%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +290%	10−11 −290%
Hitman 3	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +290%	10−11 −290%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	42 +250%	12−14 −250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +290%	10−11 −290%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +267%	12−14 −267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +290%	10−11 −290%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%