Radeon Pro W6600 vs Pro Vega 56

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pro Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2
31.91

Pro W6600 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking16392
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation2.9621.15
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVegaNavi 23
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 December 2017 (6 years ago)8 June 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $649
Current price$4999 (12.5x MSRP)$1522 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W6600 has 615% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841792
Core clock speed1247 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1250 MHz2903 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate280.0325.1
Floating-point performance9,677 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
HDMI+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.1.1251.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.91
Pro W6600 40.97
+28.4%

Pro W6600 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 56 12353
Pro W6600 15862
+28.4%

Pro W6600 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 28% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
−21.2%
120−130
+21.2%
4K57
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−27.9%
110−120
+27.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−20.5%
100−105
+20.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−25%
100−105
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−27.5%
130−140
+27.5%
Hitman 3 95−100
−21.2%
120−130
+21.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
−28.4%
95−100
+28.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−27.9%
110−120
+27.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−20.5%
100−105
+20.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−25%
100−105
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−27.5%
130−140
+27.5%
Hitman 3 95−100
−21.2%
120−130
+21.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
−28.4%
95−100
+28.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
−20.7%
140−150
+20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−20.5%
100−105
+20.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−25%
100−105
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−27.5%
130−140
+27.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
−25%
80−85
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Hitman 3 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−23%
75−80
+23%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−26.9%
85−90
+26.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
−19%
50−55
+19%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

This is how Pro Vega 56 and Pro W6600 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600 is 21.2% faster than Pro Vega 56 in 1080p
  • Pro W6600 is 22.8% faster than Pro Vega 56 in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 31.91 40.97
Recency 14 December 2017 8 June 2021
Cost $399 $649
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 100 Watt

The Radeon Pro W6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 56 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon Pro W6600

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 54 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.