Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1247
- Max video memory 8 GB
- Memory type HBM2
- Memory clock speed 786
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory 24 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 16 Gbps
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 128 | 16 |
Value for money | 1.87 | 3.40 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | Vega | GA102 |
Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 14 December 2017 (5 years old) | 12 April 2021 (2 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | no data |
Current price | $4999 (12.5x MSRP) | $2789 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 8192 |
Core clock speed | 1247 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 28,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 230 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 280.0 | 433.9 |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Width | IGP | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz | 16 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 768.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
HDMI | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.2 |
CUDA | no data | 8.6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
RTX A5000 outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 84% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
RTX A5000 outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 84% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
RTX A5000 outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 150% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
RTX A5000 outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 103% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 99 | no data |
4K | 57 | no data |
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 | no data |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 60−65 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 100−105 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 85−90 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 75−80 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 75−80 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 100−110 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 70−75 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 70−75 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65 | no data |
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 60−65 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 100−105 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 85−90 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 75−80 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 75−80 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 100−110 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 70−75 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 55−60 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 70−75 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 116 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65 | no data |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 60−65 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 100−105 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 75−80 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 75−80 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 64 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65 | no data |
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 55−60 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 30−35 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45−50 | no data |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 55−60 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27 | no data |
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 30−35 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 21−24 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 42 | no data |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16 | no data |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 31.98 | 58.81 |
Recency | 14 December 2017 | 12 April 2021 |
Memory bus width | 2048 | 384 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 8192 |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 | 768 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 230 Watt |
Based on the results of synthetic and gaming tests, our recommendation leans towards the RTX A5000 due to its superior performance when compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 56 graphics card.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.