GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

Place in performance ranking	163	63
Place by popularity	not in top-100	93
Value for money	2.95	46.49
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Vega	Turing TU104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	14 December 2017 (6 years ago)	2 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$499
Current price	$4999 (12.5x MSRP)	$261 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super has 1476% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	2560
Core clock speed	1247 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	215 Watt
Texture fill rate	280.0	283.2
Floating-point performance	9,677 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	786 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.89

RTX 2070 Super 47.12
+47.8%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 48% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 56 12353

RTX 2070 Super 18251
+47.7%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 48% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 56 25589

RTX 2070 Super 35032
+36.9%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 37% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 56 17797

RTX 2070 Super 24639
+38.4%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 38% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro Vega 56 62260

RTX 2070 Super 99847
+60.4%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 60% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pro Vega 56 65703

RTX 2070 Super 98219
+49.5%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 49% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	99 −36.4%	135 +36.4%
1440p	55−60 −52.7%	84 +52.7%
4K	57 +3.6%	55 −3.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55

−74.1%

94
+74.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −73.3%	104 +73.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −57.1%	88 +57.1%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −20.4%	118 +20.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 −109%	180 +109%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −55.6%	84 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −50%	123 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −40%	112 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −70.6%	174 +70.6%
Hitman 3	95−100 −77.8%	176 +77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −60.9%	111 +60.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −129%	117 +129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −77%	131 +77%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −85%	111 +85%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −50%	90 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −32.1%	74 +32.1%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −5.1%	103 +5.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 −61.6%	139 +61.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −44.4%	78 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −42.7%	117 +42.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −33.8%	107 +33.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −68.6%	172 +68.6%
Hitman 3	95−100 −55.6%	154 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −26.1%	87 +26.1%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −63.6%	90 +63.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −31.4%	67 +31.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −66.2%	123 +66.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	116 −56%	181 +56%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −60%	96 +60%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −8.3%	65 +8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −17.9%	66 +17.9%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +3.2%	95 −3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −35.2%	73 +35.2%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −34.1%	110 +34.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −22.5%	98 +22.5%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −50%	153 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 −56.3%	100 +56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −13.3%	68 +13.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −86.3%	95 +86.3%
Hitman 3	55−60 −80.4%	101 +80.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −46.5%	63 +46.5%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −67.6%	57 +67.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −76%	44 +76%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −91.1%	86 +91.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −62.9%	57 +62.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −55.9%	53 +55.9%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −20.3%	83 +20.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −104%	47 +104%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −71.9%	98 +71.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −49.2%	91 +49.2%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −86.6%	125 +86.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −76.2%	70−75 +76.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −88.9%	51 +88.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −104%	55 +104%
Hitman 3	30−35 −77.4%	55 +77.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +15.8%	19 −15.8%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −76.2%	37 +76.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −64.7%	28 +64.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −91.7%	46 +91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	42 −61.9%	68 +61.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −68.4%	32 +68.4%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −35.9%	53 +35.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −156%	23 +156%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −86.2%	54 +86.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −78.1%	57 +78.1%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −86.7%	84 +86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −81.3%	29 +81.3%

This is how Pro Vega 56 and RTX 2070 Super compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super is 36.4% faster than Pro Vega 56 in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super is 52.7% faster than Pro Vega 56 in 1440p
Pro Vega 56 is 3.6% faster than RTX 2070 Super in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro Vega 56 is 15.8% faster than the RTX 2070 Super.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 156% faster than the Pro Vega 56.

All in all, in popular games: