FirePro D700 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
31.95
+131%

Radeon Pro Vega 56 outperforms FirePro D700 by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking162350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.015.18
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVegaTahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 December 2017 (6 years ago)18 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$4999 (12.5x MSRP)$413

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro D700 has 72% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842048
Core clock speed1247 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate280.0108.8
Floating-point performance9,677 gflops3,482 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz5480 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s263.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
+145%
40−45
−145%
4K60
+150%
24−27
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+131%
45−50
−131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+137%
35−40
−137%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+148%
40−45
−148%
Hitman 3 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+151%
35−40
−151%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+131%
45−50
−131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+137%
35−40
−137%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+148%
40−45
−148%
Hitman 3 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+151%
35−40
−151%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+132%
50−55
−132%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+148%
40−45
−148%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+151%
35−40
−151%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+137%
27−30
−137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+154%
24−27
−154%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Hitman 3 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+141%
27−30
−141%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+154%
24−27
−154%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+147%
30−33
−147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Hitman 3 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+133%
18−20
−133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%

This is how Pro Vega 56 and FirePro D700 compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 56 is 145% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 56 is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.95 13.86
Recency 14 December 2017 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 274 Watt

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 34 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.