Radeon RX 7600M vs Pro 560X
Aggregated performance score
RX 7600M outperforms Pro 560X by a small 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 431 | 408 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 14.16 | no data |
Architecture | Polaris (2016−2019) | RDNA 3 |
GPU code name | Polaris 21 | Navi 33 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 5 June 2017 (6 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Current price | $133 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2070 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 13,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 90 Watt (50 - 90 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | 64.26 | 246.4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon Pro 560X and Radeon RX 7600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 16000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
RX 7600M outperforms Pro 560X by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
RX 7600M outperforms Pro 560X by 7% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 41
+2.5%
| 40−45
−2.5%
|
1440p | 40
+0%
| 40−45
+0%
|
4K | 17
−5.9%
| 18−20
+5.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 31
+47.6%
|
21−24
−47.6%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Battlefield 5 | 43
+22.9%
|
35−40
−22.9%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 39
+44.4%
|
27−30
−44.4%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 37
+48%
|
24−27
−48%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 36
+33.3%
|
27−30
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 53
+47.2%
|
35−40
−47.2%
|
Hitman 3 | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30
+76.5%
|
16−18
−76.5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 31
+40.9%
|
21−24
−40.9%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 25
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Battlefield 5 | 36
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 26
−3.8%
|
27−30
+3.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 33
+32%
|
24−27
−32%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 31
+14.8%
|
27−30
−14.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50
+38.9%
|
35−40
−38.9%
|
Hitman 3 | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 19
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10
−70%
|
16−18
+70%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 25
+13.6%
|
21−24
−13.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 34
+61.9%
|
21−24
−61.9%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14
−50%
|
21−24
+50%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Battlefield 5 | 33
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 31
+24%
|
24−27
−24%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 36
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Metro Exodus | 11
+37.5%
|
8−9
−37.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 7
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 9
−22.2%
|
10−12
+22.2%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how Pro 560X and RX 7600M compete in popular games:
- Pro 560X is 3% faster in 1080p
- RX 7600M is 0% faster in 1440p
- RX 7600M is 6% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 560X is 76% faster than the RX 7600M.
- in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600M is 70% faster than the Pro 560X.
All in all, in popular games:
- Pro 560X is ahead in 21 test (31%)
- RX 7600M is ahead in 37 tests (54%)
- there's a draw in 10 tests (15%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 9.50 | 10.18 |
Recency | 5 June 2017 | 5 January 2023 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 90 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 560X and Radeon RX 7600M.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.