Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Pro 555X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 555X with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Pro 555X
2017
4 GB GDDR5
8.38

RX 6700 XT outperforms Pro 555X by a whopping 514% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking47346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7223.13
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 21Navi 22
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date5 June 2017 (7 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479
Current price$894 $685 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 1245% better value for money than Pro 555X.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed855 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rate43.54413.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 555X and Radeon RX 6700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed5080 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 555X 8.38
RX 6700 XT 51.48
+514%

RX 6700 XT outperforms Pro 555X by 514% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 555X 3235
RX 6700 XT 19882
+515%

RX 6700 XT outperforms Pro 555X by 515% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−529%
151
+529%
1440p12−14
−617%
86
+617%
4K8−9
−525%
50
+525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−815%
119
+815%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−406%
85−90
+406%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−1436%
169
+1436%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−556%
160−170
+556%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−662%
99
+662%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−442%
100−110
+442%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−443%
120−130
+443%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−332%
170−180
+332%
Hitman 3 16−18
−763%
138
+763%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−870%
359
+870%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−438%
120−130
+438%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−383%
110−120
+383%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−1215%
342
+1215%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−256%
110−120
+256%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−406%
85−90
+406%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−1209%
144
+1209%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−556%
160−170
+556%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−592%
90
+592%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−442%
100−110
+442%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−443%
120−130
+443%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−332%
170−180
+332%
Hitman 3 16−18
−594%
111
+594%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−476%
210−220
+476%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−204%
73
+204%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−383%
110−120
+383%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−981%
281
+981%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1212%
223
+1212%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−256%
110−120
+256%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−406%
85−90
+406%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−1036%
125
+1036%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−554%
85
+554%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−442%
100−110
+442%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−332%
170−180
+332%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−422%
193
+422%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−823%
240
+823%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−647%
127
+647%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−163%
84
+163%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−383%
110−120
+383%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−556%
100−110
+556%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−831%
120−130
+831%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−613%
55−60
+613%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−2625%
109
+2625%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−720%
80−85
+720%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1300%
56
+1300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−954%
137
+954%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−653%
110−120
+653%
Hitman 3 12−14
−592%
83
+592%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−706%
145
+706%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1018%
123
+1018%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1822%
173
+1822%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−938%
80−85
+938%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−1450%
62
+1450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−536%
85−90
+536%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1100%
48
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1325%
57
+1325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1380%
74
+1380%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1100%
48
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−660%
75−80
+660%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−822%
83
+822%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−744%
76
+744%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−1067%
35
+1067%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−513%
45−50
+513%

This is how Pro 555X and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 529% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 617% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 525% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 2625% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6700 XT surpassed Pro 555X in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.38 51.48
Recency 5 June 2017 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 157 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5978 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.